Modern Construction Site, Nzeng-Ayong. | bureau@univga.org | (+241) 77283418

How to test an AI before entrusting it with your files?

Europe wants to test AIs before they go on the market. For legal professionals, this is a concrete issue of compliance, evidence, and day-to-day responsibility.
Lawyer reviewing a compliance checklist before using AI in a healthcare organization

Imagine a bank in Libreville using artificial intelligence (AI) to detect fraud on customer accounts. The same type of tool can help teams react quickly, but it can also be used by fraudsters to prepare deceptive messages or test vulnerabilities.

In a hospital or an administration, the question becomes even more sensitive: who answers the public, where does the data go, and who bears responsibility if the generated response is false? This is the debate opened by the European plan of July 7, 2026.

What is it, concretely?

Concretely, the European plan starts from a simple observation: an AI can help an organization detect a flaw, sort documents, analyze contracts, or respond to users, but it can also be misused to produce false information, accelerate fraud, or expose sensitive data. The proposed mechanism consists of better testing tools before their dissemination, coordinating authorities, and strengthening the security of critical sectors such as health, finance, energy, transport, and administration. The main challenge is as much legal as it is technical: knowing who controls, who validates, and who is responsible in case of damage. There is nothing to prevent the use of AI, but it must be seriously regulated.

Concrete case: what to do and what not to do

Questions to Ask Before Acting

  • What data will we entrust to the AI: simple internal documents or sensitive personal data?
  • Who validates the final answer: an administrative agent, a lawyer, a doctor, or a compliance officer?
  • Where is the data hosted, and who can access it at the provider?
  • Can we explain AI recommendations in case of a complaint, audit, or dispute?
  • Is there a log of usage, incidents, corrections, and human validations?
  • Does the contract include confidentiality, security, data deletion, and shared responsibility?
  • Do teams know how to recognize errors, false references, and risks of leakage?

UNIVGA Viewpoint

Sources

  1. European Commission, EU Action Plan on Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence
  2. Texts and Laws, APDPVP Gabon
  3. Governance and enforcement of the AI Act, European Commission
  4. Frequently Asked Questions, AI Act Service Desk
  5. Uniform Acts, OHADA
UNIVGA Press
We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

UNIVGA Group
Logo

New Report

Close

Shopping cart