Artificial intelligence agents can prepare payments or decisions. Here’s how to set limits, human validation, and evidence before action. Imagine that, in a bank in Libreville, an artificial intelligence assistant prepares a supplier transfer, checks the authorized limit, and then requests to initiate the payment. The file seems clean. However, one question blocks everything: who actually authorized the action, and what…
Imagine that in a Libreville bank, an artificial intelligence assistant prepares a vendor transfer, checks the authorized ceiling, then requests the payment to be triggered. The file appears clean. Yet, one question blocks everything: who actually authorized the action, and what proof will the audit be able to read in three months?
In a university, the same problem arises with scholarships. A tool sorts applications, identifies missing documents, suggests a priority, and prepares notifications. If the rule applied is wrong, or if personal data is used without a clear basis, the speed becomes a compliance risk.
An artificial intelligence agent (AI agent) is not just a program that answers a question: it can prepare an action, such as classifying a file, producing a report, issuing an alert, or triggering an operation. The Safeguards for Agentic Finance at Runtime (SAFR) framework, published with the Monetary Authority of Singapore, proposes placing a control between the AI agent and the business system. Before the action, the organization verifies who is acting, what is authorized, which rule applies, if a human needs to validate, and what record will be kept. The key point is simple: AI can speed up work, but responsible decision-making remains organized, controlled, and auditable.
Concrete case: what to do and what not to do
Questions to Ask Before Acting
Does the AI offer a recommendation or can it act directly in the system?
Who bears responsibility if the action is false, unjust, or non-compliant?
What actions should remain forbidden for AI, even if they seem useful?
From what risk level is formal human validation required?
Is it possible to find out why a decision was made three months later?
Are the data used necessary, authorized, and protected?
Can internal audit test the system with concrete evidence?
By clicking on "Accept All", you authorize the placement of cookies to facilitate navigation, measure audience, and provide you with information about our training programs. Privacy policy
UNIVGA Group
Set cookies
Necessary cookies remain active. Other categories are optional. Learn more
NecessarySession, security, connection.
PreferencesLanguage and display.
AudienceVisitor statistics.
ProspectingInformation about our training programs.
We detected that you may prefer English. Would you like to switch?