UNIVGA Group
Pre-registration

Modern Construction Site, Nzeng-Ayong. | bureau@univga.org | (+241) 77283418

Monitoring & analyses

How to control AI before it acts on its own?

Artificial intelligence agents can prepare payments or decisions. Here’s how to set limits, human validation, and evidence before action. Imagine that, in a bank in Libreville, an artificial intelligence assistant prepares a supplier transfer, checks the authorized limit, and then requests to initiate the payment. The file seems clean. However, one question blocks everything: who actually authorized the action, and what…

Imagine that in a Libreville bank, an artificial intelligence assistant prepares a vendor transfer, checks the authorized ceiling, then requests the payment to be triggered. The file appears clean. Yet, one question blocks everything: who actually authorized the action, and what proof will the audit be able to read in three months?

In a university, the same problem arises with scholarships. A tool sorts applications, identifies missing documents, suggests a priority, and prepares notifications. If the rule applied is wrong, or if personal data is used without a clear basis, the speed becomes a compliance risk.

Recent articles

AI at work: how to succeed without disorganizing?

AI in business: who really keeps your data?

Excel with AI: how to maintain reliable results?

What is it, concretely?

An artificial intelligence agent (AI agent) is not just a program that answers a question: it can prepare an action, such as classifying a file, producing a report, issuing an alert, or triggering an operation. The Safeguards for Agentic Finance at Runtime (SAFR) framework, published with the Monetary Authority of Singapore, proposes placing a control between the AI agent and the business system. Before the action, the organization verifies who is acting, what is authorized, which rule applies, if a human needs to validate, and what record will be kept. The key point is simple: AI can speed up work, but responsible decision-making remains organized, controlled, and auditable.

Concrete case: what to do and what not to do

Questions to Ask Before Acting

  • Does the AI offer a recommendation or can it act directly in the system?
  • Who bears responsibility if the action is false, unjust, or non-compliant?
  • What actions should remain forbidden for AI, even if they seem useful?
  • From what risk level is formal human validation required?
  • Is it possible to find out why a decision was made three months later?
  • Are the data used necessary, authorized, and protected?
  • Can internal audit test the system with concrete evidence?

UNIVGA Viewpoint

Sources

  1. MAS Partners with Industry to Develop Safeguards for AI Agents in Finance, Financial IT
  2. What is SAFR? MAS's Runtime Framework for AI Agents
  3. ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI management systems
  4. Texts and Laws, APDPVP
  5. Latest DigiCert Research Shows AI Security Risks Already Hitting Enterprises

To go further

Related Articles.

Can business software steal your sensitive data?

A flaw in a business software can grant access to plans, contracts, or client data. Here’s how to respond without limiting yourself…

Read the article

Can AI enhance the reliability of accident investigations?

An AI can identify weaknesses in an accident report, but the decision remains human. Here is a simple method for safety at…

Read the article

Digital cadastre: how to avoid land errors?

A Colorado example sheds light on land digitization: registering markers online can reduce disputes, if the evidence remains…

Read the article
UNIVGA Group
Logo
Shopping cart