UNIVGA Group
Pre-registration

Modern Construction Site, Nzeng-Ayong. | bureau@univga.org | (+241) 77283418

Monitoring & analyses

AI in business: who really keeps your data?

OpenAI announces a system to monitor AI abuses without retaining customer data. A key question for banks, hospitals, and universities. Imagine a hospital in Libreville wants to use AI (artificial intelligence) to summarize patient records before a medical meeting. Obvious time-saving. But a concern blocks the project: will the health data sent to the tool remain stored with...

Imagine a hospital in Libreville wants to use AI (artificial intelligence) to summarize patient records before a medical meeting. Obvious time-saving. But a concern blocks the project: will the health data sent to the tool remain stored with the provider? Who will be able to consult them?

The same question arises in a bank analyzing customer complaints, an administration processing social requests, or a university responding to its students. AI can help, but only if the organization knows precisely what it shares, with whom, and for how long.

Recent articles

Rio Tinto accelerates five mining startups, the proof remains to be seen

Offshore: Oxy and Valaris awarded, HSE AI must remain human

MOL solar and battery branch, the cost remains to be proven

What is it, concretely?

When a company uses generative AI, it sends a prompt and receives a response: summary, analysis, draft letter, information extraction. The risk arises when this prompt contains sensitive data, such as a medical record, a payslip, or a customer complaint. OpenAI claims that its Private Safety Processing system can detect patterns of dangerous use across multiple exchanges, without giving OpenAI employees access to detailed content. The main challenge is therefore the balance between security and privacy. Good news: an organization can significantly reduce risks if it chooses the right contract, limits the data transmitted, and maintains human validation.

Concrete case: what to do and what not to do

Questions to Ask Before Acting

  • Do the data sent to the AI contain personal, medical, financial, or HR (human resources) information?
  • Does the provider keep the instructions and responses? If so, for how long?
  • Can the data be used to train or improve the model, unless explicitly agreed?
  • Does the contract provide for deletion, auditing, encryption, and precise access management?
  • Do the data remain in a geographically acceptable area for your organization?
  • Who validates the response before it is sent to a client, patient, student, or citizen?
  • What procedure do we follow in case of an error, leak, fabricated response, or unauthorized use?

UNIVGA Viewpoint

Sources

  1. OpenAI, Offering Zero Data Retention for frontier models
  2. Anthropic Privacy Center, Data retention practices for Covered Models
  3. OpenAI Platform, Data controls in the OpenAI platform
  4. APDPVP Gabon, Missions
  5. OpenAI, Business data privacy, security, and compliance

To go further

Related Articles.

Sustainable wood: AFi promotes traceability towards proof

AFi publishes guidance on the traceability of wood supply chains. For African exporters, the certificate is no longer sufficient without verifiable data.

Read the article

The United Kingdom warns about hidden AI, audit risk

The British NCSC warns about undeclared AI in companies. A key issue for auditing, compliance, data, and governance.

Read the article

Copyright: Washington supports OpenAI, open risk

Washington supports OpenAI against the New York Times on AI training. For African lawyers, liability remains to be organized.

Read the article
UNIVGA Group
Logo
Shopping cart