How to frame AI at the university without cheating?
Generative AI is shaking up courses and assignments. A simple method to frame it without weakening learning. Imagine a university teacher preparing a didactics course. She uses AI to find examples, rephrase an instruction, and save two hours in her week. In class, her students then ask her: "Are we allowed to use it..."
The Editorial of the UNIVGA Review ·
Imagine a university teacher preparing a didactics course. She uses AI (artificial intelligence) to find examples, rephrase an instruction, and save two hours in her week. In class, her students then ask her: "Are we allowed to use it for the assignment?" No one has the same answer.
At another institution, management wants to modernize assessments with digital tools. The idea seems appealing, but one question blocks everything: what student data will be collected, stored, or reused? The issue is no longer just about allowing or prohibiting. It needs to be framed.
Generative AI refers to tools capable of producing text, plans, exercises, or answers based on a written request. ChatGPT or Copilot are well-known examples. In pedagogy, these tools can help a teacher prepare materials, vary instructions, create a practical case, or propose remediation paths. The mechanism remains simple from the user's side: a request is made, the tool responds, then the human checks, adapts, and decides. The key point is there. If the tool replaces the student's effort or the teacher's judgment, the evaluation loses its meaning. Well-framed, AI can remain a useful assistant without becoming the pilot of the course.
Concrete case: what to do and what not to do
Questions to Ask Before Acting
Is the use of AI allowed, prohibited, or framed in this specific course?
Must the student declare when they used it, and for which part of the work?
Does the requested tool collect a name, address, copy, or learning traces?
Does the assessment still measure the student's real understanding?
Is there an alternative for students who refuse or cannot use the tool?
Do the instructions distinguish between brainstorming, language correction, planning, and complete writing?
Does the institution have a common policy, or does each teacher improvise alone?
By clicking on "Accept All", you authorize the placement of cookies to facilitate navigation, measure audience, and provide you with information about our training programs. Privacy policy
UNIVGA Group
Set cookies
Necessary cookies remain active. Other categories are optional. Learn more
NecessarySession, security, connection.
PreferencesLanguage and display.
AudienceVisitor statistics.
ProspectingInformation about our training programs.
We detected that you may prefer English. Would you like to switch?