UNIVGA Group
Pre-registration

Modern Construction Site, Nzeng-Ayong. | bureau@univga.org | (+241) 77283418

Monitoring & analyses

Can AI enhance the reliability of accident investigations?

An AI can spot weaknesses in an accident report, but the decision remains human. Here’s a simple method for workplace safety. Imagine that, in a hospital in Libreville, a patient falls in a corridor. The report is filled out, signed, and then archived. Everything seems in order. Yet, the real cause remains unclear: wet floor, absence of a sign, poorly stored stretcher, staff overload…

Imagine that in a hospital in Libreville, a patient falls in a corridor. The report is filled out, signed, and then archived. Everything seems in order. Yet, the real cause remains unclear: wet floor, lack of signage, poorly stored stretcher, staff overload, or misunderstood procedure?

In a construction SME, the same scene occurs after an injury on site. The quality, hygiene, safety, and environment (QHSE) manager wants to act quickly. An artificial intelligence (AI) suggests a cause and actions. Good assistance, or a risk of incorrect conclusion?

Recent articles

Offshore: Oxy and Valaris awarded, HSE AI must remain human

MOL solar and battery branch, the cost remains to be proven

Sustainable wood: AFi promotes traceability towards proof

What is it, concretely?

After an accident or near miss, an organization writes a report: observed facts, probable causes, measures to be taken. The problem is that a file can be complete in form but weak in substance. HavenASSURE acts as a quality controller for safety investigations: it reviews the available elements, flags absent evidence, overly quick explanations, and poorly defined corrective actions. The main issue is to prevent a poor analysis from becoming a false lesson learned. For a non-specialist, think of an internal audit: the tool helps to identify inconsistencies, but it does not replace the investigator or the manager who signs off on the decision.

Concrete case: what to do and what not to do

Questions to Ask Before Acting

  • Does the AI indicate what evidence it bases its remarks on?
  • Who validates the final conclusion: QHSE, human resources, management, or the safety committee?
  • Does the file contain sensitive data: health, identity, images, videos, or geolocation?
  • Have the concerned workers been heard before concluding?
  • Do the actions really reduce the risk, or are they limited to retraining?
  • Does the company keep a clear record of human decisions made after the recommendation?
  • Does the tool comply with local obligations and the standards of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), including ISO 45001, ISO 9001, and ISO 14001?

UNIVGA Viewpoint

Sources

  1. Haven Safety Unveils HavenASSURE, Gains SOC 2 Approval, Mirage News
  2. ISO 45001 explained, ISO
  3. Responsible AI for Safety Investigations, Haven Safety
  4. Introducing HavenASSURE, Haven Safety AI
  5. National Safety Council and Wolters Kluwer Enablon Report Finds Adoption of AI Growing Rapidly Among EHS Professionals
  6. Journal Officiel de la République Gabonaise, Code du travail
  7. Journal Officiel de la République Gabonaise, protection des données personnelles

To go further

Related Articles.

The United Kingdom warns about hidden AI, audit risk

The British NCSC warns about undeclared AI in companies. A key issue for auditing, compliance, data, and governance.

Read the article

Copyright: Washington supports OpenAI, open risk

Washington supports OpenAI against the New York Times on AI training. For African lawyers, liability remains to be organized.

Read the article

Google brings YouTube closer to messaging: opportunity and risk

On August 27, 2026, Google announced it is testing YouTube ads that open a conversation with a brand. Useful for selling, to...

Read the article
UNIVGA Group
Logo
Shopping cart